What Has Morality To Do With Economics?

The last half-century has been marked by a shift in the meaning of the word morality in Western Civilizations.  It has been slowly transitioning from an objective to a subjectively based word.  What is considered to be good and evil has increasingly become dependent on one’s on opinion and less on objective and absolute standards.  One may now feel justified in defaulting on a contract simply because, in his judgement, the other person or entity is rich and doesn’t really need the money.  This mindset, when predominate, does not foster a robust economy.

Consequently, this shift has increasingly hindered economic activity over time because economics is based on millions of transactions.  Contracts are signed.  Trust is placed in others.  It is agreed that if you do this then I will do that.  As trust erodes so does the ability for the life-blood of an economy, commerce, to happen freely.  Rather contracts are broken, defaults abound and lawyers celebrate.  In the end, the economy suffers, and so do the people.

Unfortunately for society, the drag that immorality places on commerce doesn’t stop with the individual participant.  The immorality of corruption leaches upward from an immoral society into the governing authorities.  This also impedes an economy as unreasonable demands are made on the participants in commerce by those authorities.  Resources are then squandered on excessive taxation, bribes, excessive regulation and delays.

This adds up to the siphoning of resources which would have otherwise led to higher standards of living for the population.  If you’ve ever wondered why the people of some nations struggle to eat while living their lives on ground that is abounding with resources, one need to look no further than endemic corruption.

So what does morality have to do with economics?  In a word, everything.



Filed under Economic Science, Economics, Government, Human Nature, Politics, Worldview

3 responses to “What Has Morality To Do With Economics?

  1. Have you ever considered the amount of resources that are consumed today in defending resources against criminal intent? It’s huge. Considering that economics is the management of limited resources and we’re consuming much of those limited resources on protecting them, seems a given that an economy is unsustainable without morality. You know, like you said.

    • I have considered it but unfortunately it didn’t occur to me as I wrote this. Had it I would have broken it down to two posts. But you are dead on. Alarm systems, insurance, needless and silly preemptive actions due to the fear of liability suits, like a complete book of instructions that consists mainly of warnings like do not touch the chainsaw blade when engine is running. HR training classes so that no one within a victim class feels offended; and then there is the actual loss due to pilfering and theft. I’m afraid it would be a very large number, and it all comes out of the standard of living for the people. Great point.

  2. Pingback: I don’t believe in -isms, I just believe in me. « Copacabana

Shoot... bullets only, no shotguns please.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s